Close

Indiana Business Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Indiana Utility Law – Municipal Eminent Domain and Condemnation of a Utilities Company: Utility Center, Inc. v. City of Fort Wayne, 985 N.E.2d 731 (Ind. 2013)

The Indiana Supreme Court recently reversed the judgment of a trial court which had granted a city’s motion to strike the jury trial request of a utility companies and the city’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings in a case where the utility company challenged the compensation amount awarded…

Updated:

Indiana Contract Law: Carmeuse Lime & Stone v. Illini State Trucking, Inc., 986 N.E.2d 271 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013)

An Indiana appellate court recently affirmed a trial court’s decision to dismiss a limestone manufacturer’s complaint seeking indemnity from a trucking company after a complaint by the trucking company subcontractor’s employee was brought against it. In Carmeuse Lime & Stone v. Illini State Trucking, Inc., 986 N.E.2d 271 (Ind. Ct.…

Updated:

Indiana Municipal Law: Town of Cedar Lake v. Alessia, 985 N.E.2d 55 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013)

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a trial courts grant of summary judgment for the Parks and Recreation Board Members who alleged that the Town of Cedar Lake had improperly removed their positions by dissolving the Parks and Recreation Department. In Town of Cedar Lake v. Alessia, 985…

Updated:

Indiana Utility Law and Indiana Water Utility Law: Bridges v. Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC, 978 N.E.2d 447 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012)

An Indiana appellate court recently affirmed a trial court’s decision to dismiss a plaintiff’s complaint for damages, attorney’s fees and an injunction for lack of jurisdiction and the plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. In Bridges v. Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC, 978 N.E.2d 447 (Ind. Ct.…

Updated:

Indemnification Clause Indiana Law: L.H. Controls, Inc. v. Custom Conveyor, Inc., 974 N.E.2d 1031 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012)

An Indiana appellate court reversed the judgment of a trial court which had ruled in favor of a conveyor contractor. While it was an electrical subcontractor that initially brought an action against a conveyor contractor, the contractor filed multiple cross-claims against the subcontractor which resulted in trial court granting the…

Updated:

Renewable Energy Law: Muscarello v. Winnebago County Board, Case No. 11-2332 (7th Cir. 2012)

A federal appeals court recently affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of a lawsuit where the plaintiff alleged a taking under the federal and Illinois state constitutions, as well as nuisance claims, and procedural challenges to an amendment of a county ordinance in regard to a renewable energy wind project. In…

Updated:

Indiana Utility Law: Duke Energy Indiana, Inc. v. Office of Utility Consumer Counselor, 983 N.E.2d 160 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012)

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed an order from the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission which denied an electric utility company’s petition to seek deferred-accounting treatment for storm-operating expenses. In Duke Energy Indiana, Inc. v. Office of Utility Consumer Counselor, 983 N.E.2d 160 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012), a southern Indiana wind…

Updated:

Indiana Utility Law: Wagler v. West Boggs Sewer Dist., Inc., 980 N.E.2d 363 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012)

The Indiana Court of Appeals recently affirmed a trial court’s refusal to set aside an agreement that was entered into by a non-for-profit utility-West Boggs Sewer District (“West Boggs”) and a group of Amish neighbors. The Court also affirmed the trial court’s decision in refusing to award attorney’s fees to…

Updated:

EEOC Renders Guidance on Use of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “Commission”), the office which enforces Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), has released guidance this year on the consideration of arrest and conviction records in employment decisions.1 Title VII, as most employers are aware, prohibits employment discrimination based…

Updated:

National Labor Relations Board Review of Social Media Policies

In a memorandum released in 2012, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) explained its position on various social media policies after having reviewed the policies of seven employers, finding six of them to contain unlawful provisions. The rules cited by the NLRB apply to private sector employers and employees, regardless…

Contact Us